The team from ICANN staff, has worked very hard with good faith to produce an application program that is available and understandable to any qualified applicant. They have been very true to the policy in the implementation design and kept the notion of equitability in mind and were very receptive to community comments.
And yet, I am concerned. Not about the implementation's intent, nor necessarily its design. But rather, I am concerned about the implementation itself. It is not easy, even for some of us who are experienced with ICANN, its lingo, and its way with forms.
Those handling the process, are not well trained in the variety of ways things are named and done in the global non profit and service worlds. They do not seem to be flexible in understanding the varieties and features of a deserving applicant.
Those who should meet the intent of the policy, but do not have identities, names, or processes that are not Western, i,.e California look alikes, face difficulty.
Those processing also do not seem willing or capable of doing the research necessary to understand responses. They reject with statements that the applicants knows are patently false. Perhaps researching answers to understand them is not their inclination nor their job, but they respond with answers, sometimes containing false statements, that need an ICANN translator to understand.
ASP applicants need as much assistance with the application for ASP as they will need for the TLD application itself. This does not seem to be available to them.
Additionally I am concerned about outreach - there are too few even trying to apply for ASP.
#ICANN83 GAC is meeting with ALAC (At-large Advisory Committee). @avri.bsky.social says she's been helping someone fill out the new gTLD Applicant Support Program form, & even as a longtime ICANN insider, found it confusing; very concerned about targeted groups of applicants giving up completely.