Trending

#ResearchIntegrity

Latest posts tagged with #ResearchIntegrity on Bluesky

Posts tagged #ResearchIntegrity

Heliyon' retraction history👇 is a 'perfect' example for the "Bullshit Asymmetry Principle" (Brandolini's law), en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandol...

Will Elsevier & Co ever learn?
When will the Scientific Community take measures?

👉Quality over Quantity #ResearchIntegrity #CompChemSky #ChemSky #PiSky

2 2 0 0

#ResearchIntegrity pays off! 🤑

1 0 0 0
Preview
Cabells' Predatory Reports: 20,000 Journals and New Criteria Discover the latest updates on Cabells' Predatory Reports, now listing over 20,000 journals and refining criteria to combat predatory publishing.

We've got 99 Problems and 20,000 of them are Predatory Journals. Last month, we announced hitting over 20k Predatory Journals in our database. Read more here: blog.cabells.com/2026/02/11/2... #ResearchIntegrity #PredatoryJournals #Publishing

0 0 0 0
Post image

With #PeerReview forming the backbone of scholarly publishing, we're delighted to recognise the commitment & support of our peer review community. 🎉A big thank you to all our reviewers for your invaluable contributions!
✨Award recipients are...https://ow.ly/Fu6H50YwnGk
#ResearchIntegrity #PeerReview

0 0 0 0
SSP EPIC Awards. Excellence in Publishing, Information Technology, & Communications. Communication of Retractions, Removals, and Expressions of Concern Recommended Practice. NISO logo with wings. 2026 Finalist, Integrity Tools.

SSP EPIC Awards. Excellence in Publishing, Information Technology, & Communications. Communication of Retractions, Removals, and Expressions of Concern Recommended Practice. NISO logo with wings. 2026 Finalist, Integrity Tools.

ICYMI the CREC Recommended Practice is a finalist for an SSP EPIC Award! Winners will be announced @ #SSP2026 on May 28.

Thank you to our working group & standing committee members for their work to develop and maintain this important standard! niso.org/press-releas...

#ResearchIntegrity

1 0 1 0
Post image

Join KGL at #STMinDC! The team will be on site April 22-23 to discuss how publishers are adapting to the next phase of #AI, #PeerReview, #ResearchIntegrity, and integrated end-to-end services.

📅 Schedule a meeting to explore how to future-proof your publishing strategy at kwglobal.com/stmus26

1 0 0 0

#researchintegrity #academicsky

1 0 0 0
Preview
How to categorize citation irregularities: A proposal based on an exploration of the literature Citation irregularities undermine the fairness and reliability of scholarly communication, yet the terms used to describe these behaviors remain fragmented and inconsistently defined.We employed a ...

📝 Latest Article Alert! 📝

"How to categorize citation irregularities: A proposal based on an exploration of the literature"

Qilin Zhang, Yitong Li & @lexbouter.bsky.social

→ doi.org/10.1080/0898...

#Citation
#ResearchIntegrity
#ResearchMisconduct

4 3 0 0
Video

Join Simon as he discusses trust and integrity in terms of publishing, as well as our first published White Paper. Learn more at blog.cabells.com/2026/04/01/o...
#Publishing #ResearchIntegrity #PredatoryJournals

0 0 0 0
Post image

🌷 Happy Easter!

🌍 Here's a #WeeklyDilemma for you to think about:

At what point does “telling a clear story” become misrepresentation?
How much simplification is acceptable in research communication?

Comment below to tell us about your thoughts on this dilemma!

#ResearchIntegrity

2 0 0 0
Post image

We are excited to announce Abdelazim Negm as an Official ACSE Ambassador 🌍✨

🔥 Ready to be a part of this movement?

👉 Apply now:

🔗 theacse.com/ambassadors....

🚀 Shape the future. Strengthen research. Lead with ACSE.

#ACSE #AmbassadorProgram #AcademicExcellence #ResearchIntegrity #GlobalScholars

0 0 0 0
Screen capture of BMJ webpage https://www.bmj.com/content/391/bmj-2024-083382

Research
RETRACTED: Prevention of acute myocardial infarction induced heart failure by intracoronary infusion of mesenchymal stem cells: phase 3 randomised clinical trial (PREVENT-TAHA8)
BMJ 2025; 391 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-083382

Published 29 October 2025)
Cite this as: BMJ 2025;391:e083382

This article has corrections, but has also been retracted. Please see:
EXPRESSION OF CONCERN: Prevention of acute myocardial infarction induced heart failure by intracoronary infusion of mesenchymal stem cells: phase 3 randomised clinical trial - November 12, 2025
CORRECTION: Prevention of acute myocardial infarction induced heart failure by intracoronary infusion of mesenchymal stem cells: phase 3 randomised clinical trial (PREVENT-TAHA8) - March 31, 2026
RETRACTION: Prevention of acute myocardial infarction induced heart failure by intracoronary infusion of mesenchymal stem cells: phase 3 randomised clinical trial (PREVENT-TAHA8) - March 31, 2026
Armin Attar, professor1,Seyed Alireza Mirhosseini, medical doctor1,Ahmad Monabati, professor2 3,Mohammad Kasaei, assistant professor1,Firoozeh Abtahi, associate professor1,Yahya Kiwan, assistant professor4,Massoud Vosough, associate professor5,Negar Azarpira, professor6

Screen capture of BMJ webpage https://www.bmj.com/content/391/bmj-2024-083382 Research RETRACTED: Prevention of acute myocardial infarction induced heart failure by intracoronary infusion of mesenchymal stem cells: phase 3 randomised clinical trial (PREVENT-TAHA8) BMJ 2025; 391 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-083382 Published 29 October 2025) Cite this as: BMJ 2025;391:e083382 This article has corrections, but has also been retracted. Please see: EXPRESSION OF CONCERN: Prevention of acute myocardial infarction induced heart failure by intracoronary infusion of mesenchymal stem cells: phase 3 randomised clinical trial - November 12, 2025 CORRECTION: Prevention of acute myocardial infarction induced heart failure by intracoronary infusion of mesenchymal stem cells: phase 3 randomised clinical trial (PREVENT-TAHA8) - March 31, 2026 RETRACTION: Prevention of acute myocardial infarction induced heart failure by intracoronary infusion of mesenchymal stem cells: phase 3 randomised clinical trial (PREVENT-TAHA8) - March 31, 2026 Armin Attar, professor1,Seyed Alireza Mirhosseini, medical doctor1,Ahmad Monabati, professor2 3,Mohammad Kasaei, assistant professor1,Firoozeh Abtahi, associate professor1,Yahya Kiwan, assistant professor4,Massoud Vosough, associate professor5,Negar Azarpira, professor6

📣The [faked] PREVENT-TAHA8 trial paper was #retracted from @bmj.com after 5 long months 😅

🤝 well done @deevybee.bsky.social @steamtraen.eu @sophieehill.bsky.social @wjst.de @ioanaacristea.bsky.social @gidmk.bsky.social P.T. Wilmhurst and anonymous @pubpeer.com users

#ResearchIntegrity 🔍 #FoSci

16 6 1 2

👇...right, but 'official' rankings (like THE...) are so heavily gamed, that they are similarly meaningless!

...and to call those 'officially' listed = "elite" sounds like a bizarre joke for many...
👉 compare with the 'Research Integrity Risk Index' sites.aub.edu.lb/lmeho/ri2/

#ResearchIntegrity

0 0 0 0

#Science without moral integrity is not a quest for knowledge, but merely the efficient administration of the status quo and the abuse of power. #ResearchIntegrity #powerabuse #academicsky

2 0 0 0
Preview
Guest post: Should universities investigate questionable papers students and faculty wrote elsewhere? Be-Art/iStock I am a research ethicist and often get asked by my university to investigate when potential concerns are raised about our staff or students. One example involved the recent case of th…

· #AcademicSky · #ResearchIntegrity · @retractionwatch.com

Should universities investigate questionable papers students and faculty wrote elsewhere?

0 0 0 0
SSP EPIC Awards. Excellence in Publishing, Information Technology, & Communications. Communication of Retractions, Removals, and Expressions of Concern Recommended Practice. NISO logo with wings. 2026 Finalist, Integrity Tools.

SSP EPIC Awards. Excellence in Publishing, Information Technology, & Communications. Communication of Retractions, Removals, and Expressions of Concern Recommended Practice. NISO logo with wings. 2026 Finalist, Integrity Tools.

NISO's Communication of Retractions, Removals, & Expressions of Concern (CREC) Recommended Practice is a finalist for a 2026 @scholarlypub.social.bsky EPIC Award! Winners will be announced at the #SSP2026 Annual meeting on May 28.

niso.org/press-releas...

#ScholComm #ResearchIntegrity #standards

0 1 1 0
Preview
Guest post: Should universities investigate questionable papers students and faculty wrote elsewhere? Be-Art/iStock I am a research ethicist and often get asked by my university to investigate when potential concerns are raised about our staff or students. One example involved the recent case of th…

👇University View on Research Integrity Violations: relevant points indeed...

👉BUT there is something more to do for institutions:

Stop Counting Numbers and Boycott Rankings - these are the main incentives for citation gaming

#ResearchIntegrity

3 0 1 0
Promotional graphic with headshots of 7 speakers and contributors and the text: ‘Scholarly Publishing and Ethical Research in the AI Era. April 9-10, 2026 I 4:00 PM – 5:30 PM IST. Celebrating ACS 150’

Promotional graphic with headshots of 7 speakers and contributors and the text: ‘Scholarly Publishing and Ethical Research in the AI Era. April 9-10, 2026 I 4:00 PM – 5:30 PM IST. Celebrating ACS 150’

Join ACS Interactions—a 2‑day webinar on scholarly publishing and ethical research in the AI era, co‑hosted by CSIR‑NIScPR and ACS.

🗓️ Apr 9–10 | ⏰ 4–5:30 PM IST
🎓 Certificate provided
🔗 buff.ly/fXcyteN

#ScholarlyPublishing #AIinScience #ResearchIntegrity

0 0 0 0
Preview
These medical X-rays are all deepfakes — and they fool even radiologists Radiologists and large language models alike have a hard time picking out real medical images from fake ones.

Radiologists given a mix of real and AI-generated X-rays averaged 75% accuracy. Experience made no difference. LLMs scored 57-85%. We talk about AI-generated text but image integrity needs to catch up.

www.nature.com/articles/d41...

#ResearchIntegrity #ImageIntegrity

2 0 0 0
Post image

What does it mean when a journal is placed “on hold” in Web of Science Core Collection?

Dr. Nandita Quaderi explains how journal re‑evaluation works, why some journals are delisted, and how research integrity guides the process.

clarivate.com/academia-gov...

#ResearchIntegrity #WebOfScience

0 0 0 0
Preview
How-to Series -- The Embassy of Good Science Wiki - YouTube

📺 Are you looking to add new content to The Embassy wiki website?

We've created a new 'How-To' series on:
🌟 How to add new modules
🧩 How to create interactive content
📚 How to create courses

Check out the series now on YouTube:
www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...

#ResearchIntegrity #ResearchEthics

2 0 0 1
Post image

Every unique mind deserves to be celebrated. 💙
At @academaxjournals.bsky.social , we believe difference is a strength, not a barrier.
This April, we stand with the autistic community, because every life has value.

#WorldAutismMonth #InclusiveEducation #Academax #AcademicSky #ResearchIntegrity

7 2 0 0
Publications of Atta reported and retracted, by publisher

Publisher                 Not Retracted || Retracted
  Elsevier                         63   11
  Wiley                            28    1
  MDPI                             27   13
  Taylor & Francis                 20    0
  Springer Nature                  11    2
  ACS                               3    7
  SC Virtual Company of Physics     8    0
  RSC                               2    3
  SAGE                              1    1
  Others                            4    0
  Bentham                           1    0
  De Gruyter                        1    0

Publications of Atta reported and retracted, by publisher Publisher Not Retracted || Retracted Elsevier 63 11 Wiley 28 1 MDPI 27 13 Taylor & Francis 20 0 Springer Nature 11 2 ACS 3 7 SC Virtual Company of Physics 8 0 RSC 2 3 SAGE 1 1 Others 4 0 Bentham 1 0 De Gruyter 1 0

Cumulative Hazard of Retraction, by Publisher for Ayman Atta
ACS retracted the quickest with all retractions done after 330 days approximately, Wiley and Springer Nature the slowest. Elsevier started late, with a jump around 570 days.

Cumulative Hazard of Retraction, by Publisher for Ayman Atta ACS retracted the quickest with all retractions done after 330 days approximately, Wiley and Springer Nature the slowest. Elsevier started late, with a jump around 570 days.

Ayman Atta (KSU🇸🇦, EPRI🇪🇬) has now 38 #SciRetraction which should earn him rank 2️⃣3️⃣ on @retractionwatch.com's leaderboard!🏅
🐌 mean retraction time 413 days😴

🤝Team work with @mumumouse2.bsky.social
@nvitiensis.bsky.social and others ❤️

#ResearchIntegrity 🔍 #ImageForensics #FoSci
#ThisImageIsFine

7 1 2 1
Post image

Secondary data is valuable when verified and contextualized.
Accuracy builds trust.
Organic Growth | Honest Storytelling | Real Connections
#DataValidation #ResearchIntegrity #BusinessIntelligence #www.nexarasoft.in⁠

0 0 0 0
Preview
Major conference catches illicit AI use — and rejects hundreds of papers The papers’ watermarks allowed organizers to detect use of large language models in peer review.

ICML embedded hidden watermarks in papers to catch AI-generated reviews. 506 reviewers flagged, 497 papers rejected under their reciprocal review policy. Only catches careless use, but this type of AI policy is refreshing.

www.nature.com/articles/d41...

#PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity

0 0 0 0
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Daly, T., & Nazarovets, S. (2026). Corruption of the Blood-Brain Barrier Literature Identified by ‘Tortured Phrases’: A Case Study for Bibliometric Neuroethics. Current Alzheimer Research, 23. https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672050460224260206052444

Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Daly, T., & Nazarovets, S. (2026). Corruption of the Blood-Brain Barrier Literature Identified by ‘Tortured Phrases’: A Case Study for Bibliometric Neuroethics. Current Alzheimer Research, 23. https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672050460224260206052444

Our new paper in Current Alzheimer Research explores “tortured phrases”: bizarre terms like blood-brain obstruction instead of blood-brain barrier. Not just bad English, but potential signals of paper mills & weak peer review. doi.org/10.2174/0115... #ResearchIntegrity #OpenScience #Bibliometrics

1 0 0 0
Post image

Our team of highly trained research integrity experts carefully review flagged manuscripts, ensuring that genuine errors, misinterpretations, or misconduct are assessed with care and context.

Learn more:  https://f.mtr.cool/qacwqqbdzo 

#AIinPublishing #AcademicPublishing #ResearchIntegrity

0 0 0 0
Post image

Sharing recognition is an incredible feeling! ✨We're delighted to celebrate all outstanding reviewers and the exceptional contribution you make to the #PhysicalScience community. Explore more 👉 https://ow.ly/lh8950YwnuP
#PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity

0 0 0 0
Post image

EMBO’s Senior Policy Officer, Sandra Bendiscioli, shared lessons from 10 years of EMBO Fora on #ResponsibleResearch at yesterday's #ENRIO Annual Meeting in Tallinn, Estonia. 🧪

Learn more:
www.embo.org/policy/research-integrit...
#ResearchIntegrity

6 0 1 0
Video

Join us for a Q&A session! What is a Research Integrity Standing Committee, and how is it different from ad hoc committees?
Explore our webinar, "The Essential Guide to Forming a Research Integrity Standing Committee," to learn more: https://post.citiprogram.org/41y0McG
#ResearchIntegrity #RISC

1 0 0 0